Action Research

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Lecture 6 (25/5/09)

Firstly we are asked to write down our personal details and answer some questions regarding education. At the final part, we are asked to draw a tree and write down our date of birth. Our lecturer wanted to relate our personalities with the drawing and the date we were born. Below are the questions asked:

1. Mengapa ingin menjadi cikgu?
2. Guru yang anda paling suka dan sebabnya.
3. Guru yang anda benci dan sebabnya.
4. Apakah tugasan seorang guru? (Lecturer’s answer: Knowledge sharing between the teachers and their students. It happens in two ways.)

Secondly, we are asked to work in pairs to discuss on one of the presentation during the Seminar Pendidikan Serantau that we attended last week (19-5-09 to 21-05-09). After the discussion with our partner, our lecturer asked few of the students to present their discussion in front of the class and she gave comments which increase the understanding of action research among us. Below is the result of discussion between my partner and I. We are required to discuss from 4 aspects which are what, how, why and the procedures of the research.

Tajuk : Hubungan antara konsep kendiri dengan motivasi pelajar


Kenapa : Kajian ini dilakukan untuk menganalis hubungan antara konsep kendiri dengan motivasti pencapaian pelajar dengan mengikut status sosioekonomi keluarga berdasarkan jantina

Apa : Hubungan motivasi dengan pencapaian pelajar tidak berhubung rapat dengan factor sosioekonomi


Bagaimana : Penggunaan skala likert, teknik soal selidik dan konsep kendiri Rosenberg digunakan untuk pengumpulan data. Penganalisissan data dilakukan dengan teknik korelasi Pearson, Ujian-t dan Anova Sehala


Prosedur : 100 pelajar iaitu 30 lelaki dan 70 perempuan di sebuah sekolah kebangsaan dengan dijadikan sampel dengan menggunakan teknik-teknik yang disebutkan tadi untuk penganalisisan data.

During the lesson, we did discuss on few terms which are:
- Contextual analysis
- Historical Research
- Bibliography analysis
- Survey Research

Before the class end, we are required to form a group of 5 and prepare a proposal on the topic that we had chosen entitled Peningkatan penglibatan pelajar perempuan dalam Kadet Polis. We are required to hand in our assignment by 28/5/09, Thursday.

Report on Seminar Pendidikan Serantau Ke-4

Title: The application of game technique to develop English language skills of Indonesia labor (TKI) in Riau province

Presenter : Erni S.

Session: 3C5

Date/ Day: 20/5/2009, Wednesday

Time: 9.50am-10.10am

Venue: Sri Meranti

Chairman: Pn Hamidah Yamat

Note taker: Lim Siew Yee

Main points:

1. To develop Indonesian labors’ English language skill through ’game technique’

2. Too see whether the application of game technique can increase the workers ability on vocabulary, language function and skill of communication for daily activities.

3. Results are gained through written and oral tests. Problems are identified due to the fact that the characteristics of the samples are varied.

4. As for the conclusion, game technique does increase the level of English language skills among workers

Discussion:

1. English that is taught in the program is too formal. Workers should be exposed to communication skills in daily life.

2. Workers should also be exposed to practical training such as training in household activities besides mastering the skills in English language.

Monday, May 18, 2009

Journals' Review

Article 1: MINUTE MATH: AN ACTION RESEARCH STUDY OF STUDENT SELF-ASSESSMENT

Article 2: CHANGING INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICE THROUGH ACTION RESEARCH

Article 3: COLLABORATIVE ACTION RESEARCH ON THE LEARNING AND TEACHING OF ALGEBRA: A STORY OF ONE MATHEMATICS TEACHER’S DEVELOPMENT

Comparison and Differentiation

  • Related to mathematical learning and teaching
  • Collaborative action research between mathematics teachers and university educators
  • Reflection plays significant role in all the studies
  • Required students’ higher-order thinking and metacognitive processes
  • Setting: classroom
  • Article 1: Focusing on the students’ self progression
    Article 2 & 3: Focusing on the effort of the teachers to bring changes toward their teaching methods
  • Article 2 & 3: Longer timeline ( 2 years).
  • Article 2: Result is described in narrative form
    Article 1 & 3: Result is presented in statistical form
  • Article 1: Students ( samples ) aged 8 years old
    Article 2 & 3: Students (samples) aged 12-14 years old
  • Article 1: 2 classes involved
    Article 2: 1 classes involved
    Article 3: 5 classes involved

    Analysis
    Article 1:
    This study focuses on third grade students regarding their self- assessment in memorizing the multiplication table. 2 classes were selected including the special education students. Suitable strategies of learning are introduced to the students. Students were evaluated every week for 10 weeks. Besides, students are required to set predicted score in their weekly test and a bar graph is plot to compare the predicted and true score. Students are also required to fill in the reflection sheet regarding their previous goals, study strategies and plans for the future weeks. The forms used by both classes were slightly different due to the fact that the students who undergo special education faced difficulties with the reflection sheet. Hence, their teacher modified the reflection sheet to include some response questions and drawing. Data from each class were first analyzed separately because the classroom assessment environment is different. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the quantitative data from students’ bar graphs and reflection sheets. Qualitative data from student reflection sheets were summarized into tables by week and by question and inspected for patterns. These patterns were used to generate case studies for each student. Interpretive summaries were constructed for data teacher interviews. Graphs are shown for the predicted score, accurate score, min, median and maximum. Data is also shown in tabular form for strategies used reasons why strategies worked, reasons why strategies didn’t work and so on. There are also description on teachers’ interview and strategies used in textual explaination. The result analysis in this article is well organized and readers are able to gain a very clear picture of the whole study.

    Article 2:
    This article is mainly about a collaborative action research between a middle school teacher and a mathematics teacher educator that focused on the teacher’s attempts to change her instructional practice. Collaboration and support reflect on teachers’ beliefs and reflective practice are the stages taken during the study. During the collaboration, new sequences of the new topic are created together between the teacher and educator. Brainstorming activities are done by students to ensure that the objectives are fulfilled. Manipulative skills are implemented into the lesson taught. Opened-ended questions are used to check the understanding of the students. Observation is done by both of the teacher and educator to look at the result of efficiency of the changes of instructional practice they had made. When either one of them are teaching in front of the class, the other person will be the observer who would take note and jot down suggestion about things that can be improved. Besides, reflection is also one of the methods that the teacher used to analysis the pros and cons of the teaching method used. Observation and reflection are good ways to find out the efficiency of the changes in instructional practice. This study varies from others where we can’t gain the result through quantitative data. The method of observation helps the teacher to discover their weaknesses in teaching immediately and find ways to enhance their way of teaching.

    Article 3:
    This article described the changes of teaching algebra in a middle school. The teacher intended to teach students algebra through a manipulative program rather than the traditional textbook approach. The study had two phases. At first, the teacher taught using the manipulative method. After a period of time, the teacher taught in a non-manipulative style by using the textbook. Data is collected through an end-of-year survey, weekly student reflections, teacher observations and teacher reflections, student work samples and test scores and a whole-class interview. Data about students’ ability to solve algebraic equations were initially
    gathered through student work samples and student tests scores during both the ‘manipulative phase’ and the ‘book’ phase. Some students were also videotaped while demonstrating algebraic solutions. The second phase of the study took place the next academic year. The team investigated the same students’ high school experience to examine the ‘durability’ of the results
    of the manipulative experiences in phase one. Data is collected and presented through tabular form. Data regarding the overall grade average from both the textbook phase and the manipulative phase is compared. The overall grade includes the grades earned on homework, quiz, and test scores during this grading period. To get further information from the result, the data is broken down where comparison is done regarding class average performance during periods of manipulative work and textbook work before and after manipulative instruction. The study continued for the second year when the students went on to high school. Study is done on the interest of students in learning algebra through the textbook instruction and manipulative instruction. The data in this particular report is well organized. The author clearly showed the data in table where the readers can do their own comparison easily. Besides, the analysis of data is also well prepared. The description not only explains the quantitative data but explaination regarding the pattern of data gained is also provided. Reasons and suggestions are included in the result segment in the report. I feel that the author really put lots of effort during the whole process where she really eager to find out the reasons and solutions for the topic she carried out.

    Evaluation

    Article 1:
    The report is short but dense. The description is straight to the point. The way the author present the report is well organized. Information is grouped according to certain categories. The data analysis is mainly on the statistical explaination. The author did not state the reasons and further explaination on the pattern of data.

    Article 2:
    The report included literature reviews and introduction of some important keywords and terms in the study. This is a way to expose readers who are beginners in action research. Readers can understand in a better way. However, the report is in narrative form where readers need to read the whole part to gain all the elements such as the data analysis, results and so on. It is difficult for readers to trace back certain information in the report. They need to look back over the whole narrative report and it is wasting of time.

    Article 3:
    Like article 2, this report also included literature reviews and introduction of some important keywords and terms. Besides, there is also further explaination on the undergoing process. As a reader, we can even imagine the whole practice. The way the author present the result can be considered as one of the strength in this report. Statistical data is shown with the textual description regarding the reasons and solutions of the data pattern. The information is useful for others who are doing the similar research. The discussion of this report provides readers wide range of understanding regarding the research itself and also the person involved.
  • Conclusion:

    Article 1:
    The result for this study is positive. The methods used are suitable for the chosen topic. Students who did their self assessment did increase their metacognitive level. However, differences in the classroom assessment environments will encourage students to perform differently. Therefore, we can say that students’ self assessment is context dependent. As the result shown, students will apply their selected study strategies in order to memorize the timetable. However, the students in this study are still young; therefore teachers should teach, guide and support them throughout the process of self assessment. Unlike the other articles, the focus of this article is narrow. It focuses mainly on the progression of self assessment among the students. It didn’t emphasis the impact on other parties such as the teacher involved through the entire research. The collaborative level among the teacher is also low where they actually didn’t discuss and do reflection in groups.

    Article 2:
    The result for this study is also positive. At the end of the day, the author realizes the ways to improve her own instructional practice in the class with the help of her collaborative friend. At the same time, she discovered the importance of having a collaborative partner during her action research. The collaborative partner is significant in this particular research due to the fact that the observation from the partner will provide useful feedback and suggestion which are the result analysis of the study. Unlike the other two study, this project followed models and protocols such as features from Mclaughlin (1990) and principles from Clarke’s (1994). The reflective and constructive model for understanding teacher change from Edwards (1996) was also one of the models used as the guidelines for this research. The research also concluded that the teacher is the final decision maker in the classroom which provides directions for the students for rooms of improvements in learning. In short, the research done by this author is not limited for her only but also beneficial to all the teachers out there who wish to change their teaching ways in order to improve themselves.

    Article 3:
    The result for this report is a little bit complicating. On the author’s point of view and results shown, she believes that students learn best through manipulative methods. Unfortunately, the teachers in secondary schools deny the efficiency of the method taught by the author. Hence, as a resolution to her problem, she intended to switch the teaching method from 8th grade to sixth grade. Her aim is to instill I believe that this research will be continued in the future and further report will be written regarding the progression of the research. This project includes wide range of study. The scope consist of the results from the data, the author’s reflections, decisions made after the resulting, the changes of the author’s professional growth and issues in collaboration research. It can be said that the author did a deep research on the selected topic and also the issues related with it. In short, action research is not a tool to further personal or professional development but a tool for teachers who seek for changes.

    Synthesis
  • Article 1:
    Students in two third grade classes including special education students are involved in the ‘Minute Math’ project. It is a collaborative research conducted jointly by two university supervisors, three teachers, and three student teachers. This project involved students in predicting and graphing their test scores on a weekly evaluation test of the 0–9 multiplication facts. Students also reflected each week on their progress and the success of their studying and problem-solving strategies. Student self-assessment was successful in helping students to gain deeper experience on monitoring their own mathematics learning. Most of the students enjoyed participating in self assessment. Flash card is the most preferred strategy that applied in the assistance of memorization. Students will apply the strategies that they are comfortable with frequently. Though self assessment is a powerful tool in memorizing the multiplication facts, students still need the guidance of their teacher in order to be in the appropriate track.


    Article 2:
    Action research collaboration between a middle school mathematics teacher and a mathematics teacher educator that focused on the teacher’s attempts to change her instructional practice in her teaching methods was done. The middle school teacher wrote a narrative description of the collaboration and of the changes she made in her instructional practice as a result of the collaboration. An interpretive analysis of the teacher’s narrative by the teacher educator reveals that the collaboration itself supports the whole idea of the project. The teacher’s reflections on her own beliefs and practices which derived from the collaboration were important to her process of change. At the end of the day, collaborative research is proved to be useful in doing educational research whereby the middle school teacher couldn’t be successful without the assistance of her collaborative partner.

    Article 3:
    This collaborative research conducted by a university mathematics educator and an eighth-grade mathematics teacher investigating on the outcomes of implementing manipulative approaches in teaching algebra. This algebraic study serves as a vehicle for examining the questions, reflections, and changes brought forth by the mathematics teacher throughout the collaborative process. Within this paper, issues related to the collaborative action research in the mathematics classroom that are connected to the teacher’s transformation are discussed. These issues include the characterization of collaborative research and goals for collaborative action research as well as the challenges for collaborative action research in mathematics classrooms.

Thursday, May 14, 2009

Titles for Journal Review

1st Journal

Title: MINUTE MATH: AN ACTION RESEARCH STUDY OF STUDENT
SELF-ASSESSMENT

Authors: SUSAN M. BROOKHART, MARISSA ANDOLINA, MEGAN ZUZA
And ROSALIE FURMAN

Year: 2004


2nd Journal

Title: CHANGING INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICE THROUGH ACTION RESEARCH

Authors: THOMAS G. EDWARDS and SARAH M. HENSIEN

Year: 1999

3rd Journal

Title: COLLABORATIVE ACTION RESEARCH ON THE LEARNING AND TEACHING OF ALGEBRA: A STORY OF ONE MATHEMATICS TEACHER’S DEVELOPMENT

Authors: ANNE M. RAYMOND and MARYLIN LEINENBACH

Year: 2000

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Lecture 4 Literature Review ( 11/5/2009 )

Steps in action research (Johnson, 2005)
1. Literature reviews
2. Problem statements
3. Planning on data collection
4. Data collection and data analysis
5. Developing action plan
6. Suggestion and plan sharing
* The steps above are cyclic*


Literature Reviews

1. Studies on literature materials such as books, journals, articles and reports

2. Emphasis on main points

3. Critical thinking is needed for:
a. Comparison
b. Analysis
c. Evaluation
d. Conclusion
e. Synthesis


Terminologies:

Comparison:
1. Develops relationships based on similarities and differences.
2. Compare criteria on:
a) sample
b) setting
c) collection of data
d) analysis of data

Differentiate:
1. To show the distinction between studies

Analysis:
1. To investigate information of a whole to its component parts to gain understanding of a concept
2. To seek relationship between the component parts
3. Needs several thinking skills due to the fact that it is a complicating process

Evaluation
1. To determine the pros and cons of an issue according to the findings we gained through our studies
2. To accept or reject an idea

Conclusion
1. Decision making regarding the investigation based on the hypothesis or problem statement

Synthesis
1. The combination of ideas and items to generate the whole picture in textual description.

Book Review : Action Research

1. Author : Patrick J.M. Costello
2.Year : 2003
3.Title : Action Research
4.Country: Great Britain
5.Publisher: Continuum


The concept of action research

Basically, action research is referred to variously as a term, process, enquiry, approach, flexible spiral process and as cyclic. It has a practical, problem-solving emphasis. It is carried out by individuals, professionals and educators. It involves research, systematic, critical reflection and action. It aims to improve educational practice Action is undertaken to understand, evaluate and change. Research involves gathering and interpreting data, often on an aspect of teaching and learning. Critical reflection involves reviewing actions undertaken and planning future actions.

The design of action research
There are several models which are introduced in this book but Denscombe’s model is chosen as the action research model. The framework involves beginning with professional practise and reflecting critically on it. Such reflection may lead to the identification of a particular problem or issue that requires research. When this enquiry has been completed, the findings from the research become the starting point for the development of an action plan. Strategic planning leads to instigating change, which impact on professional practise. The cycle then begins again and a further round of critical reflection enables the researcher to evaluate changes made. At this point, conclusion may be drawn and the project may come to an end. However, it is possible that, following the evaluation, the steps are repeated again to enhance the findings.

Why teachers need to undergo action research?
Teachers are considered as practitioners. Practitioners are concerned with studying their own practice and action research provides an excellent medium for this to take place. Action research enables practitioners to explore relationship between educational theory and practice. The critical role of educational research has led to an increasing on the importance of practitioners undertaking their own research studies. Action research can be beneficial impact both on school improvement and on the professional development of teachers.

Procedure of action research
1.Do reading on research methodology.
2.Consult completed research project reports
3.Undertake literature reviews
4.Write an outline of your proposed project
5.Detail the content of the action research
6.Meet supervisor regularly to discuss on project
7.Produce draft on chapters and sections of the action research project for the supervisor to read
8.Ensure continuity between chapters or sections of the project report

Research ethics

Practitioners should be open about their research and that they should ensure that those who involved in it are always informed regarding the progression of studies. On the other hand, permission should be sought before researchers engage in any form of observations or examine documentation that may have been produced for purpose other that research project. Practitioners should also ensure that any descriptions of others’ work or the viewpoints they offer must be agreed with the parties concerned before reports are submitted for examinations and publication.

Collection and analysis of data

There are 3 examples provided in this particular book. There are:

1. Developing an effective school governing body by the head teacher of a secondary school.
2. Developing questioning in organizations by a middle manager in a retail business.
3. Developing thinking skills in the early years classroom by a trainee teacher

Ø Research Instruments

Example 1:
I. Observation chart
II. Questionnaire
III. Interview schedule

Example 2:
I. First observation chart
II. Second observation chart

Example 3:
I. Videotaping
II. Audio taping

Ø Techniques of collecting data

Example 1:
I. Searching information regarding on the problems statements of the action research project and research methodology through the online databases
II. Inviting lecturers to assist in observation
III. Developing questionnaire
IV. Interviewing smaller sample of the group

Example 2:
I. Searching information regarding on the problems statements of the action research project and research methodology through the online databases.
II. Involvement of a senior colleague observing his questioning during meetings in order to ascertain the number and nature of the questions asked.
III. Devises questions in categories such as closed questions, affective questions, probing questions, checking questions and reflective questions.
IV. Develops a second observation card
V. Catalogues research by maintaining a personal records of the process

Example 3:
I. Searching information regarding on the problems statements of the action research project and research methodology through the online databases.
II. Videotaping a lesson taught in classroom
III. Audio taping two of the classroom lesson and transcribing examples of the dialogues in which the teacher engages with her class

Overall:
I. Using multiple sources when collecting data
II. Continually testing your assumptions
III. Seeking exceptions in cases of apparent agreement and explainations in cases of apparent disagreement and being willing to challenge your own ideas.

Analysis of data

Example 1:
I. The items analyzed in the observation chart includes the details of the agenda items for the meeting of the school’s governing body, the number of minutes for which each member speaks on a particular topic and the total number of minutes for which members speak expressed as percentage of the whole.
II. As for the data collected in the questionnaire, it is analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. A variety of possible options for response are provided. In some questions, several alternatives are offered for respondents to choose. Some of the questions required respondents to give comments. All the data is analyzed individually to determine whether common or uncommon themes emerge.
III. In analysing data, we should focus on four important key terms.
- Themes: the consistent ideas which emerged
- Incidence: how often something occurred, or the number of questionnaire replies which said the same thing.
- Patterns: the timing of the occurrence whether they were single or cluster.
- Trends: the frequency of the patterns.

Example 3:

I. To examine the videotape of the mentor’s lesson and write down the names of children who demonstrate any of the above processes of argument, together with the statements they make and the process that is involved
II. The raw data can be transferred to a second sheet where pupils’ contributions or examples of particular process should be grouped. This will enable the researcher to determine whether pupils are demonstrating competence in regard to specific processes.

The analysis of data for example 2 is not discussed here but the author intended to ask the readers to figure out some questions regarding example 2

Reliability and validity

Based on the book, reliability refers to the consistency or stability of a measure while validity is concerned with “whether an item measures or describes what it is supposed to measure or describe. The better the research instruments we develop collecting data, the more reliable those data will be. The more reliable our data, the greater are our chances of undertaking research that merits the label “rigorous”. The more rigorous our research, the more likely it is that our conclusions and recommendations will be significant.

Overview of the book
Basically, this book is very suitable for starters who just began to take part in their action research studies. The guidelines in this particular book expose the readers to basic aspects in action research. It’s like learning our ABC before we can spell out words. Each topic in this book includes explaination and examples of the theories and principles involved. Besides, this particular book also provide format of writing a proper report of an action research. There are also recommendations regarding further reading on the topic of action research. In short, this book provides valuable guidelines for the readers regarding each stage of an action research project, from the basic terminologies, to the reasons of undertaking action research, data collection, and analysis of data until the final stage which is the report writing.

Saturday, May 9, 2009

Lecture 3 Pengurusan Perubahan dalam Pendidikan ( Kuliah 4/5/09 )

4 jenis perubahan:

1. Perubahan ke arah peningkatan
- Terdapat perubahan dalam struktur organisasi

2. Perubahan strategik organisasi
- Melibatkan perubahan dalam peranan organisasi, nilai teras, misi, organisasi staf, struktuk dan strategi organisasi

3. Perubahan akibat daripada jangkaan
- Perubahan dilakukan disebabkan oleh kesedaran dalam kalangan pengurusan yang perlu diadakan perubahan bagi memastikan organisasi memperoleh kebaikan
kompetitif.

4. Perubahan reaktif
- Perubahan ini berlaku akibat tindak balas langsung daripada pelanggan &
pihak berkepentingan

Perubahan adalah kompleks
- Perubahan berlaku disebabkan oleh evolusi dan revolusi.

Perubahan itu multidimensi
Terdapat 6 dimensi:
a) Tujuan perubahan
b) Unit perubahan
c) Sifat perubahan
d) Magnitud perubahan
e) Skop perubahan
f) Jangkamasa perubahan

Chambers (1977) mengatakan bahawa perubahan itu berbentuk kitaran di mana setiap kitaran perubahan dijangka berakhir dalam tempoh 10 hingga 15 tahun.

Model-model perubahan
a) Model penggabungan Roger
b) Model Kanter
c) Model Rand
d) Model Acot

KERJA KUMPULAN:
NYATAKAN 8 SEBAB MENGAPA ORANG MENENTANG PERUBAHAN &
BINCANGKAN CARA PENYELESAIANNYA


Sebab-sebab:
a) Sikap konvensional
b) Selesa dengan keadaan semasa
c) Prosedur birokrasi yang mengambil masa yang panjang
d) Persekitaran yang tidak sepadan dengan perubahan
e) Tidak mendapat sokongan daripada pihak atasan
f) Kekurangan peralatan
g) Pendedahan pengetahuan yang sempit
h) Kekurangan keyakinan diri

Cara penyelesaian:
a) Mempunyai sikap terbuka
b) Kerjasama di antara pihak pentadbir dan pihak pendidik
c) Menyempurnakan diri dengan ilmu kontemporari
d) Selalu bersedia untuk menerima sesuatu yang baru
e) Kelengkapan peralatan yang sesuai

Saturday, May 2, 2009

Lecture 2 Action Research Protocol













Ebbutt














Kemmis





Elliott